|
Board Notes
A Summary of the April 11,
2011 Tyler ISD Board of Trustees Workshop
Meeting
Board
Approves Certification of Unopposed
Candidate
The Board of
Trustees approved a Certification of
Unopposed Candidate for Single Member
District 2. Texas Election Code, Chapter 2,
Subsection C, Section 2.052 allows a school
district not to conduct an election in a
single member district where a candidate is
unopposed. During the February 17, 2011,
Board Meeting, Trustees approved an Order to
Call a General Election on May 14, 2011, to
fill trustee positions for Single Member
Districts 2. The three-year terms of office
for Single Member District 2 will expire in
May. Rev. Orenthia Mason is the current
trustee for Single Member District 2.
Board
Approves Order Declaring Cancellation of
Trustee Election and Election of Unopposed
Candidate
The Board of
Trustees approved an Order of Cancellation
of Election and certify the election of Rev.
Orenthia Mason as trustee for Single Member
District 2 for a term of three years
expiring in May 2014.
Board
Approves Order Establishing Election Day
Polling Places; Dates, Times, and Locations
for Early Voting By Personal Appearance
The Board of
Trustees approved the Order Establishing
Election Day Polling Places; Dates, Times
and Locations for Early Voting by Personal
Appearance for the May 14, 2011 General
Election for School Board Trustee for Single
Member District 4. Smith County, City of
Tyler, Whitehouse Independent School
District and Tyler Independent School
District have entered into an agreement to
hold a joint election conducted by the Smith
County Election Administrator. By
coordinating efforts, the result has been
the elimination of duplicate costs and
labor, shared polling locations and a more
convenient process for voters.
Board
Approves Thin Client System Purchase
The Board of
Trustees approved a contract with INX, Inc.
in the amount of $1,878,944.17 to provide a
turnkey virtual desktop system hardware,
software, installation, configuration and
training. The proposed system price
includes 3 years hardware and software
maintenance. An analysis of the Return On
Investment (ROI) of the proposed system
versus continuing to purchase the district
standard student PC shows the ROI of 102%
and a payback in 7.7 months. Funding for
the proposed system is provided by E-rate
refunds, CTE and funds previously designated
by the Board for school bus purchases and
special maintenance projects.
Demographic Update 2011
Dr. Pat Guseman and Dr. Stacey Tepera with
Population and Survey Analysts (PASA)
presented to the Board of Trustees
information about a new demographic report
compiled by the company. Dr. Guseman said
the data is used by the school districts for
long range planning, growth projections, and
possible redistricting. She shared growth
of Tyler ISD compared to other districts in
Smith County as well as growth in the
district's economically disadvantaged
population. She also shared how the growth
of kindergarten students in the past years
has indicated a healthy growth at the
elementary level.
Data from a new source was shared that
showed 23 percent of the population in Tyler
ISD are employed in the educational services
and health care professions. She also
discussed the current economy and
unemployment as well as projected employment
figures and the local economy factors that
are considerations of the proposed data.
Dr. Guseman shared housing characteristics
and how that impacts a changing student
population. She identified the largest
residential single family, multi-family and
condo developments throughout the Tyler
area. She shared projected new housing
occupancies for various increments for the
next one, five and ten years. She shared
that on the average, there is fewer than one
child per home in the Tyler ISD boundary.
She said you have to realize that numerous
young couples and senior citizens are also
home owners so it lowers the average number
of students per home. She projects the
student ratio for Tyler ISD is lower than
the state average because of the large
number of retirees that live in the
community. She shared three scenarios of
growth for projected enrollment which
included low, medium and high growth
potentials.
Dr. Tepera presented projections for each
campus using the current attendance zones
for the next one, five, and ten year
increments. She said all elementary
students projected to be attending next year
compared to all elementary school, the
district has 90% of functional capacity
across the district. When looking at
utilization per campus there is a wide
discrepancy from 65 percent to more than 100
percent. The middle school comparison
varies as well with 53 percent at one campus
and 137 percent at another. She said the
high school comparison shows 100 percent
utilization by both campuses, but when
transfers are factored into the equation, 83
percent is at one campus and more than 100
percent is at the other.
Dr. Reid shared with the Board that the full
demographic update will be available on the
Tyler ISD website very soon.
Discussion of Long Range Planning
Steve Hulsey, with Corgan Associates, Inc.,
presented to the Board of Trustees
information about long range planning
relevant to possible district program
initiatives. He compared Tyler ISD to eight
other school districts to show the number of
campuses, the student size, as well as the
types of facilities such as ninth grade
centers, CTE programs, early college
programs, and non-traditional programs.
Through this comparison data, he shared that
the average size of high schools is 2562,
middle schools is 774, and elementary
schools is 611.
He shared several scenarios to the Board
including variations of a one, two and three
high school feeder pattern. He compared
these types of models to Allen ISD,
Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD and
Birdville ISD. He shared the pros and cons
of each as well as the operational costs
associated with each of the facilities.
Hulsey shared that Grand Prairie ISD has a
model where the third high school is a
specialized school for the Career and
Technology Education courses, STEM, early
college and other programs where
extra-curricular activities are not offered
except at the two high schools, also
considered a student's base school. Dr.
Reid said this plan would increase costs at
the high school level so that an option to
reduce expenses at the middle school level
may need to be considered. Dr. Reid
stressed the importance of making long range
plans for the district.
It was brought up for discussion as to how
would this long range planning picture be
addressed. Is the middle school or the high
school issues addressed first? And how do
we want to include the community in these
discussions. Dr. Reid said the intention of
today is to start conversations about where
do we want to head as a district, and these
scenarios are a good discussion starting
point.
|