|
BOARD NOTES
A Summary
of the April 11, 2011 Tyler ISD Board of Trustees Workshop
Meeting
Board Approves Certification of Unopposed Candidate
The Board
of Trustees approved a Certification of Unopposed Candidate
for Single Member District 2. Texas Election Code, Chapter
2, Subsection C, Section 2.052 allows a school district not
to conduct an election in a single member district where a
candidate is unopposed. During the February 17, 2011, Board
Meeting, Trustees approved an Order to Call a General
Election on May 14, 2011, to fill trustee positions for
Single Member Districts 2. The three-year terms of office
for Single Member District 2 will expire in May. Rev.
Orenthia Mason is the current trustee for Single Member
District 2.
Board Approves Order Declaring Cancellation of Trustee
Election and Election of Unopposed Candidate
The Board
of Trustees approved an Order of Cancellation of Election
and certify the election of Rev. Orenthia Mason as trustee
for Single Member District 2 for a term of three years
expiring in May 2014.
Board Approves Order Establishing Election Day Polling
Places; Dates, Times, and Locations for Early Voting By
Personal Appearance
The Board
of Trustees approved the Order Establishing Election Day
Polling Places; Dates, Times and Locations for Early Voting
by Personal Appearance for the May 14, 2011 General Election
for School Board Trustee for Single Member District 4.
Smith County, City of Tyler, Whitehouse Independent School
District and Tyler Independent School District have entered
into an agreement to hold a joint election conducted by the
Smith County Election Administrator. By coordinating
efforts, the result has been the elimination of duplicate
costs and labor, shared polling locations and a more
convenient process for voters.
Board Approves Thin Client System Purchase
The Board
of Trustees approved a contract with INX, Inc. in the amount
of $1,878,944.17 to provide a turnkey virtual desktop system
hardware, software, installation, configuration and
training. The proposed system price includes 3 years
hardware and software maintenance. An analysis of the Return
On Investment (ROI) of the proposed system versus continuing
to purchase the district standard student PC shows the ROI
of 102% and a payback in 7.7 months. Funding for the
proposed system is provided by E-rate refunds, CTE and funds
previously designated by the Board for school bus purchases
and special maintenance projects.
Demographic Update 2011
Dr. Pat
Guseman and Dr. Stacey Tepera with Population and Survey
Analysts (PASA) presented to the Board of Trustees
information about a new demographic report compiled by the
company. Dr. Guseman said the data is used by the school
districts for long range planning, growth projections, and
possible redistricting. She shared growth of Tyler ISD
compared to other districts in Smith County as well as
growth in the district's economically disadvantaged
population. She also shared how the growth of kindergarten
students in the past years has indicated a healthy growth at
the elementary level.
Data
from a new source was shared that showed 23 percent of the
population in Tyler ISD are employed in the educational
services and health care professions. She also discussed
the current economy and unemployment as well as projected
employment figures and the local economy factors that are
considerations of the proposed data.
Dr.
Guseman shared housing characteristics and how that impacts
a changing student population. She identified the largest
residential single family, multi-family and condo
developments throughout the Tyler area. She shared
projected new housing occupancies for various increments for
the next one, five and ten years. She shared that on the
average, there is fewer than one child per home in the Tyler
ISD boundary. She said you have to realize that numerous
young couples and senior citizens are also home owners so it
lowers the average number of students per home. She
projects the student ratio for Tyler ISD is lower than the
state average because of the large number of retirees that
live in the community. She shared three scenarios of growth
for projected enrollment which included low, medium and high
growth potentials.
Dr.
Tepera presented projections for each campus using the
current attendance zones for the next one, five, and ten
year increments. She said all elementary students projected
to be attending next year compared to all elementary school,
the district has 90% of functional capacity across the
district. When looking at utilization per campus there is a
wide discrepancy from 65 percent to more than 100 percent.
The middle school comparison varies as well with 53 percent
at one campus and 137 percent at another. She said the high
school comparison shows 100 percent utilization by both
campuses, but when transfers are factored into the equation,
83 percent is at one campus and more than 100 percent is at
the other.
Dr. Reid
shared with the Board that the full demographic update will
be available on the Tyler ISD website very soon.
Discussion of Long Range Planning
Steve
Hulsey, with Corgan Associates, Inc., presented to the Board
of Trustees information about long range planning relevant
to possible district program initiatives. He compared Tyler
ISD to eight other school districts to show the number of
campuses, the student size, as well as the types of
facilities such as ninth grade centers, CTE programs, early
college programs, and non-traditional programs.
Through
this comparison data, he shared that the average size of
high schools is 2562, middle schools is 774, and elementary
schools is 611.
He
shared several scenarios to the Board including variations
of a one, two and three high school feeder pattern. He
compared these types of models to Allen ISD,
Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
and Birdville ISD. He shared the pros and cons of each as
well as the operational costs associated with each of the
facilities.
Hulsey
shared that Grand Prairie ISD has a model where the third
high school is a specialized school for the Career and
Technology Education courses, STEM, early college and other
programs where extra-curricular activities are not offered
except at the two high schools, also considered a student's
base school. Dr. Reid said this plan would increase costs
at the high school level so that an option to reduce
expenses at the middle school level may need to be
considered. Dr. Reid stressed the importance of making long
range plans for the district.
It was
brought up for discussion as to how would this long range
planning picture be addressed. Is the middle school or the
high school issues addressed first? And how do we want to
include the community in these discussions. Dr. Reid said
the intention of today is to start conversations about where
do we want to head as a district, and these scenarios are a
good discussion starting point.
|